Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deborah Carver's avatar

"Patterns in the zeitgeist" is one of those phrases that men like you use to seem cool, but we both know that media coverage is a lagging indicator of any trend, if a trend at all. Culture writers and internet publications make ok work for whiling away the hours, but they're not legitimate trend reports.

We've been over why you sucked 20 years ago (you volunteered to make money for jerks, legitimizing the low road of discourse for the manosphere generation). But let's cover why you sucked 10 years ago!

Ten years ago guys like you would roll up to a client with a strategy deck of like five cultural headlines from the Atlantic and NYT and point at it and confidently say "trend!!!" And even though everyone smart knew you were full of it because collecting internet headlines (get this) is not a valid form of trend research by any industry or academic standards. Clients certainly aren't going to buy media based on what's already in the discourse.

And those of us who did real analysis would sit quietly during your presentations and clock how off about digital audience behaviors you were, and our clients knew that you were full of it too. But the older ad guys would keep at it, pointing at the headlines instead of listening to the behavioral data or the bespoke, expensive strategic research that told them otherwise.

Also, around that time, we were making a lot of money for our clients while you were running a company toward bankruptcy. Beep beep! Watch out for Ben's zeitgeist!!!

No posts

Ready for more?